Dumani v nair and another 2013 2 sa 274 sca
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2012/196.html http://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZALCJHB/2016/413.pdf
Dumani v nair and another 2013 2 sa 274 sca
Did you know?
WebDumani v Nair and another 2013 (2) SA 274 (SCA) Dumani a magistrate was convicted at a disciplinary hearing on three counts of sexual misconduct. His application for review … WebNeutral citation: Collen Mzingisi Dumani v Desmond Nair & another (144/2012) [2012] ZASCA 196 (30 November 2012) Coram: MPATI P, CLOETE, HEHER, CACHALIA and …
http://saflii.austlii.edu.au/za/cases/ZALCCT/2014/10.pdf
WebDumani v Nair and Another (Dumani). 2. For a material mistake of fact to form a ground of review, such ground must be confined to a fact that is established in the sense that it is … http://www.saflii.mobi/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2024/476.pdf
WebMar 15, 2024 · As a result of complaints concerning his conduct, made by the Cuban government to the South African ambassador, he was recalled to South Africa. One consequence of this was that his cost of living allowance (COLA) was stopped. He was also threatened with disciplinary proceedings, which never materialised.
Web1 State Information Technology Agency SOC Limited v Gijima Holdings (Pty) Limited 2024 (2) SA 23 (CC). 4. ... 5 Judicial Services Commission and Another v Cape Bar Council and Another 2013 (1) SA 170 (SCA) at para 51. 6 Democratic Alliance v President of South Africa and Others 2013 (1) SA 248 (CC) at para 39 . 8. 9. how to write month and year correctlyWebReviews Section 33 of the Constitution Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA) Section 21 and 22 of Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 Uniform Rules 6 and 53 … how to write month in sqlWebPaper zz zz. Explore. Log in; Create new account how to write month name from dateWebThe equivalent of this second requirement is also the main limit on the new ground in South Africa: see Dumani v Nair[2012] ZASCA 196, 2013 (2) SA 274 (SCA); and for discussion see Cora Hoexter, “A Rainbow of One Colour? oris 640Web3 E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49, [2004] QB 1044. 4 E, above n 3, at [63] and [66]. I would argue that there is good justification for adopting mistake of fact as confined by this test, correctly understood; subject only to room for argument about the stringency of the materiality test. oris 690WebNov 30, 2012 · The first respondent, Mr Desmond Nair (the presiding officer), is the chief magistrate of Pretoria, who presided over an inquiry into misconduct charges brought … oris 624WebApr 20, 2024 · The Appellants have also relied on the decisions of this Court in the case of Konkan Railway Corporation Limited v. Rani Construction Private Limited 2002 2 SCC … how to write more formally